Türk edebiyatında şiir eleştirisi: Osmanlı'dan Cumhuriyet'e
No Thumbnail Available
Files
Date
2012
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Abstract
The principal problem in this dissertation has been determined as the effect of the approach of poetry criticism in Turkish literature up to the period of the Republic on the production of poetry. Locating the poet at its center, this critical approach was not only effective in helping court poetry to attain the characteristic of becoming a tradition by providing the newly-emerging poets with a model, but also provided the patron with the opportunity to make good choices concerning which poet to patronize. The critical tradition, based on rhetoric in court poetry, was re-shaped in line with ?good literature? (edebiyat-ı sahiha?) in the period of Reorganization (Tanzimat), and Servet-i Fünûn poets remained mostly loyal to this system of rhetoric which was rendered functional once again. Following the declaration of second Constitutionalism (Meşrutiyet), the changing political atmosphere brought about the re-definition of literature. In the critical approach of this period, as in that of the post-Reorganization, the program of literature which was aimed to be reconstituted was put forth, and then the ?good? poet was identified on the basis of being in accordance with the paradigms of this program. As such, the fact that poetry production leaned on certain rules and that poets who complied by those rules were considered successful suggests that the critical approach that lasted from the Ottoman period to the Republican period was structurally ongoing but that the concepts central to the approach had gained new meanings over time.
Description
Keywords
Türk edebiyatı, şiir