Umman Körfezi ile Basra Körfezi arasındaki geçiş rejimleri
Özet
In this century, the word has seen a lot of noticeable changes in the international law of the sea. The existing law of the states which tried to codify and develop these rules and regulations about the seas. Although a number of the laws are customary, most of them including those relating to straits have no customary background. Genneva convention 1958 considered the issue of straits very briefly, but the 1982 convention devoted its third part to the straits capable of being used for international navigation. This thesis has attempted to demonstrate the compatability or incompatability of the Islamic Republic of Iran's laws concerning its maritime zones with the international law and the 1982 Montego –Bay convention. It has also endevoured to examine the legal regim of the Hormuz strait, in the light of provisions of the 1958 Genneva and 1982 Montego–Bay Convetion, and show advantages and disadvantages of Iran's accestion to the 1982 convention. Cosidering the 1982 convetion, it seems that the legal regim of passage in the Hormuz Strait is subject to the legal regim of transit passage. In conclusion, the thesis suggest that Iran's ratification of the 1982 convention, will many advantages for Iran. This is because there are a few provisions in the 1982 convention that many not be in conformity with Iran's policies, but the rest of this convention will certainly secure Iran's interests with respect to its maritime zones and its national sovereignty.