Yasama meclisi içtüzüğü (hukuki niteliği ve yargısal denetimi)
Özet
SUMMARYParliaments are one of the indispensible institutions of modern democracies.Boards which comprise representatives of communities have got the power tolegislate at the end of relatively long process. Standing Orders that is the subject ofour thesis are the texts which comprise the rules how the parliaments works. Mainaim of our thesis is to clarify the juridical character of standing orders of theparliament. In order to clarify the juridical character of standing orders, firstly thelegislative function and acts are defined. By this way, the position of standing ordersthrough the legislative acts is fixed. As the parliaments continue to make progress,the standing orders are also continue to develop. So that, our thesis include thehistorical evolution of the standing orders in Ottoman-Turkish parliamentarism.Standing orders have two meaning which are narrow and wide. The narrowmeaning of standing orders is the text of a systematic order. The wide meaning ofstanding orders contains various types of legal texts about how parliament works,decisions of courts and the traditions which occasionally take place in practice withthe narrow meaning of standing orders. Standings orders are one of the parliamentacts that is under the control of Constitutional Court. The reason of this control is toprevent standing orders of the parliament to become a dictatorial gun in the hands ofmajority. Consequently, we analyze the decisions of Constitutional Court regardingstanding orders in our thesis.The most important conclusion of this thesis is every recently electedparliament have the right to make its own standing orders. Another conclusion is thatStanding Orders must be a formal parliament order. The last conclusion is thatprovisions which binds and obligates citizens cannot be regulated by Standing Orderswhich must include provisions about the process of parliament.