Türkiye Türkçesi ve Halha Moğolcasında çatı
Özet
The Voice in Turkey Turkish and Khalkha Mongolian,Doctorate Thesis, Advisor: Prof.Dr. F. Sema Barutcu ÖZÖNDER, XİX + 348 s.In this thesis called ?The Voice in Turkey Turkish and Halha Mongolian?,grammatical voice are investigated according to written materials of historical andmodern Turkish and Mongolian languages and characteristics of causative, passive,cooperative-reciprocal, reflexive and active voices are determined. This thesisconsists of the following sections: Introduction, Chapter 1. Causatives in Turkish andMongolian Languages, Chapter 2. Passives, Chapter 3. Reflexive Voice, Chapter 4.Cooperative-Reciprocal Voice, Chapter 5. Active Voice, Chapter 6. TheCombinations of Morphological Voice Markers.?Introduction? deals with the problems how ?voice? was interpreted inMongolian and Turkish grammarian schools of Middle and New periods. In thissection of the thesis, definitions of the following categories namely ?activity-passivity?, ?transitivity-intransitivity? and ?voice? are given and the ties that connectthem are determined. The place of ?animacy? within these categories is also fixed. Inthis way, the category of voice is researched in connection with the factors that givea shape to voice types and determine their meanings. These factors are as following:animacy of agent and patient, questionability of agent and possibility of showing it(e.g. agent) in the sentence.In the first chapter, the author investigates two kinds of causativeconstructions named ?ettirgenlik? and ?oldurganlık? and sets forth a new ideaconcerning the factor that shapes them. According him the factor that shapes these367causative constructions is not transitivity or intransitivity of verb stem, but its activeor passive property. In order to prove his idea, the author presents different examplescollected from historical and modern Turkish and Mongolian materials. In thischapter, the answers are given to questions concerning the influence of transitive-intransitive feature of verb stem upon causative verbs and the meaning ofmorphological causative voice markers (e.g. causative suffixes).In the next chapter, the problems concerning passivization are handled andthe passive constructions are described. It is suggested here that in these languagesthe factors that shape different types of passive constructions are directly connectedwith the questionability of agent and the possibility of showing it in the sentence.Cooperative-reciprocal voice and its markers are investigated in the ThirdChapter, while reflexive voice that was attested in Turkish in all the periods ishandled in the Forth Chapter. It is considered that Mongolian doesn?t have ?reflexivevoice?, as reflexivity in this language is not expressed by means of morphologicalmarkers, but in this language reflexivity is expressed analytically.In this thesis, both root verbs and verbs with voice suffixes that don?testablish voice relations are classified as ?verbs in active voice?. The last chapterinvestigates the combination of the voice suffixes in Turkish and Mongolianlanguages.