Modern ve postmodern dönemde sanatta soyutun felsefi temelleri
Özet
Through long periods the abstract movements in art, was obliged to challenge with the problems in its infrastructure and the negative associations brought by its meaning. However its positive quality was appreciated in some periods, generally surprised its spectators, as a puzzle to be solved, it was evaluated as a practical that is suggesting mental studying and different point of views. This new and interesting point of view was fed and enriched by various theories of philosophy. This enrichment, that the intuition generally announces itself by an inner oriented concentration, was separated from objectivity by the confidence of modern art and modernity to belief of abstracting and by rising importance of subjectivity. Although , this was an important movement for abstract art, orienting of postmodern art to subject and by being of work of art to be subjected to pronounciated text , a new artistic order made itself sensed by enabling removal of every kind of art tendencies like reabstractivity and sublimelity. In contrast to the claims that this was the end of the art, we can also assume that this was only mid transition. Because of the selective attitude in its nature, it was not accepted. Presentation of art to mass of world, was based on a mass of values. But in a world that subjects were fetished and abstract was replaced by abstract images, the presentation of fetished subjects is still carrying an abstract quality.