İonik yapılarda diş sırası ve problemleri
Özet
AbstractThe dentil is a element which placed on the Ionic entablature. Its origin, positions and functional value hasn't known completely yet. We have both little and worse material and their earlier specimens are lamentably state. We know that early no evidence for the dentils. Collecting of the data was being biggest problem. Therefore it is difficult ta analysis the dentils problems. The intention here is just to determine the dentils problems and specially study proportions of the speciamens af the dentils in Anatolia. I've want all measuring done myself, but I coundn't realized that. Some of the measuring are taken directly from the publications or have to be measured from drawing. All the measuring which I used, except for Apollon Tempel at Smintheion, already published. There is one problem the teeth are usually treated as if all has the same proportions in spite of there is great variations be, for example Zeus Temple at Labraunda. I prefer using photographs to drawings in this observation. This is handy to making style-critic, also sections used for the observations. There is no specimen for existence of dentils of the Archaic Period in the Anatolia. After producing many examples of dentils at the end of 5 th c. B.C., they preserved. The earliest of these Nereids Monument at Xanhus and Heroon at Limyra. These monuments and other earliest examples can have been influenced earlier Anatolian buildings. We looked for some answers for these questions in the search: According to this observation on the proportions of the Ionic dentils could be classified to different periods, different regions and different types of buildings? Could be a local school classified according to dentils? We couldn't find satisfying lines in the observation. Vitruvius gives some proportions for the dentils (IV 2). The height of the teeth, the width of the teeth, the with of the intervals and the depth of the teeth could be shown with the following series of figures: 6-3-2-6 Many examples which have been taken into observations are not congruent with this series. This is an astonishing situation.